Patients’ expectations of acute low back pain management: implications for evidence uptake
© Hoffmann et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 31 July 2012
Accepted: 26 December 2012
Published: 8 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|31 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Tammy Hoffmann|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Etienne Vermeire|
|17 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - stephen may|
|18 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Tammy Hoffmann|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Dec 2012||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-14-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.