Medicines use reviews: a potential resource or lost opportunity for general practice?
© Latif et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 25 November 2012
Accepted: 3 May 2013
Published: 6 May 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Nov 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Asam Latif|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Blenkinsopp|
|4 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Delyth James|
|31 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Asam Latif|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Delyth James|
|25 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Asam Latif|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|25 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|3 May 2013||Editorially accepted|
|6 May 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-14-57|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.