Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evidence of prescription of antidepressants for non-psychiatric conditions in primary care: an analysis of guidelines and systematic reviews

  • Alain Mercier1Email author,
  • Isabelle Auger-Aubin2,
  • Jean-Pierre Lebeau3,
  • Matthieu Schuers1,
  • Pascal Boulet1,
  • Jean-Loup Hermil1,
  • Paul Van Royen4 and
  • Lieve Peremans4, 5
BMC Family Practice201314:55

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-55

Received: 20 November 2012

Accepted: 24 April 2013

Published: 4 May 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Nov 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - alain Mercier
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tobias Freund
14 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - helene vaillant-roussel
15 Feb 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Bereczki
15 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - alain Mercier
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tobias Freund
18 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - helene vaillant-roussel
28 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Bereczki
14 Apr 2013 Author responded Author comments - alain Mercier
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Apr 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
24 Apr 2013 Editorially accepted
4 May 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-14-55

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of General Practice, Rouen University and CIC Inserm 0204, University of Rouen
(2)
Department of General Practice, Denis Diderot Paris 7 University
(3)
Department of General Practice, Tours University
(4)
Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Antwerp
(5)
Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Advertisement