A qualitative study of primary care professionals’ views of case finding for depression in patients with diabetes or coronary heart disease in the UK
© Maxwell et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 6 December 2012
Accepted: 18 March 2013
Published: 4 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Dec 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carolyn Chew-Graham|
|22 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katrina Turner|
|23 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Dowrick|
|26 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Margaret Maxwell|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Carolyn Chew-Graham|
|28 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Katrina Turner|
|28 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Dowrick|
|6 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Margaret Maxwell|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|4 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-14-46|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.