An observational descriptive study of the epidemiology and treatment of neuropathic pain in a UK general population
© Hall et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 28 May 2012
Accepted: 15 February 2013
Published: 26 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Darmon|
|28 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Beverly Collett|
|13 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Gillian Hall|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Gillian Hall|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Feb 2013||Editorially accepted|
|26 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-14-28|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.