Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

General practitioners’ views on quality markers for children in UK primary care: a qualitative study

BMC Family Practice201213:92

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-92

Received: 8 June 2012

Accepted: 30 August 2012

Published: 14 September 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
8 Jun 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Ridd
22 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fiona Wood
16 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Peter Gill
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fiona Wood
28 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Ridd
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
14 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-13-92

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta