Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Improvement of primary health care of patients with poorly regulated diabetes mellitus type 2 using shared decision-making – the DEBATE trial

  • Eva Drewelow1Email author,
  • Anja Wollny1,
  • Michael Pentzek2,
  • Janine Immecke2,
  • Sarah Lambrecht2,
  • Stefan Wilm2, 3,
  • Iris Schluckebier3,
  • Susanne Löscher3,
  • Karl Wegscheider4 and
  • Attila Altiner1
BMC Family Practice201213:88

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-88

Received: 17 July 2012

Accepted: 13 August 2012

Published: 22 August 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Eva Drewelow
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
13 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
22 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-13-88

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Rostock University Medical Center
(2)
Institute of General Practice, University of Düsseldorf
(3)
Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke
(4)
Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg

Advertisement