Coronary heart disease in primary care: accuracy of medical history and physical findings in patients with chest pain – a study protocol for a systematic review with individual patient data
© Haasenritter et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 28 February 2011
Accepted: 27 July 2012
Published: 9 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Feb 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Farmer|
|8 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Joerg Haasenritter|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Farmer|
|28 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rafael Perera|
|26 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Joerg Haasenritter|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Joerg Haasenritter|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rafael Perera|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|27 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|9 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-13-81|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.