Emerging organisational models of primary healthcare and unmet needs for care: insights from a population-based survey in Quebec province
© Levesque et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 26 September 2011
Accepted: 2 July 2012
Published: 2 July 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|26 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Raynald Pineault|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Elliott|
|7 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah-Anne Munoz|
|7 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Raynald Pineault|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sarah-Anne Munoz|
|24 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Elliott|
|4 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Raynald Pineault|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|4 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|2 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|2 Jul 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-13-66|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.