Automated bolus advisor control and usability study (ABACUS): does use of an insulin bolus advisor improve glycaemic control in patients failing multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) therapy? [NCT01460446]
- David A Cavan†1,
- Ralph Ziegler†2,
- Iain Cranston†3,
- Katharine Barnard†4,
- Jacqueline Ryder†1,
- Claudia Vogel†5,
- Christopher G Parkin†6Email author,
- Walter Koehler†7,
- Iris Vesper†8,
- Bettina Petersen†8 and
- Robin S Wagner†9
© Cavan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 11 April 2012
Accepted: 8 October 2012
Published: 13 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hiroshi Sakura|
|8 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helen Murphy|
|22 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Christopher Parkin|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Helen Murphy|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|13 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-13-102|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.