Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

General practitioners’ views on the acceptability and applicability of a web-based intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for acute cough in multiple European countries: a qualitative study prior to a randomised trial

  • Sibyl Anthierens1,
  • Sarah Tonkin-Crine2Email author,
  • Elaine Douglas3,
  • Patricia Fernandez-Vandellos4,
  • Jaroslaw Krawczyk5,
  • Carl Llor6,
  • Jochen WL Cals7,
  • Nick A Francis8,
  • Lucy Yardley9,
  • Samuel Coenen1,
  • Theo Verheij10,
  • Herman Goossens11,
  • Paul Little2 and
  • the GRACE INTRO study team
Contributed equally
BMC Family Practice201213:101

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-101

Received: 26 June 2012

Accepted: 8 October 2012

Published: 11 October 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Jun 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Tonkin-Crine
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paula Smailes
22 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cara Litvin
13 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Tonkin-Crine
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
8 Oct 2012 Editorially accepted
11 Oct 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-13-101

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for General Practice, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Laboratory of microbiology, University of Antwerp
(2)
Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton
(3)
Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University College London
(4)
Applied Research in Respiratory Diseases, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
(5)
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Medical University of Lodz
(6)
Primary Care Centre Jaume I, University Rovira i Virgili
(7)
Department of General Practice, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University
(8)
Cochrane Institute of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University
(9)
Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, University of Southampton
(10)
Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht
(11)
Laboratory of Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), University of Antwerp

Advertisement