Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Health Alliance for prudent antibiotic prescribing in patients with respiratory tract infections (HAPPY AUDIT) -impact of a non-randomised multifaceted intervention programme

  • Lars Bjerrum1, 2Email author,
  • Anders Munck2,
  • Bente Gahrn-Hansen2,
  • Malene Plejdrup Hansen2,
  • Dorte Ejg Jarbol2,
  • Gloria Cordoba2,
  • Carl Llor3,
  • Josep Maria Cots3,
  • Silvia Hernández3,
  • Beatriz González López-Valcárcel4,
  • Antonia Pérez4,
  • Lidia Caballero5,
  • Walter von der Heyde5,
  • Ruta Radzeviciene6,
  • Arnoldas Jurgutis6,
  • Anatoliy Reutskiy7,
  • Elena Egorova7,
  • Eva Lena Strandberg8,
  • Ingvar Ovhed8,
  • Sigvard Mölstad8,
  • Robert Vander Stichele9,
  • Ria Benko9,
  • Vera Vlahovic-Palcevski9,
  • Christos Lionis10 and
  • Marit Rønning11
BMC Family Practice201112:52

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-52

Received: 25 February 2011

Accepted: 20 June 2011

Published: 20 June 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Feb 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Martin Gulliford
28 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Svein Gjelstad
29 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Lars Bjerrum
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Svein Gjelstad
22 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Lars Bjerrum
Resubmission - Version 4
22 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Lars Bjerrum
Resubmission - Version 5
29 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Lars Bjerrum
Resubmission - Version 6
8 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
20 Jun 2011 Editorially accepted
20 Jun 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-12-52

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen
(2)
Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark
(3)
Spanish Society of Family Medicine
(4)
University of Las Palmas, Gran Canarias
(5)
Misiones Association of General Family Medicine
(6)
Public Health Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Klaipeda University
(7)
Association of Family Doctors
(8)
Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University
(9)
European Drug Utilisation Research Group
(10)
World Organisation of Family Doctors (WONCA) Europe
(11)
World Health Organisation, Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology

Advertisement