Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
4 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
25 Oct 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Katja Goetz |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
25 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
15 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jill Thistlethwaite |
22 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Adrian Hastings |
24 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lorelei Jones |
28 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joe Rosenthal |
17 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Katja Goetz |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
17 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
7 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joe Rosenthal |
17 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Adrian Hastings |
24 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lorelei Jones |
20 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Katja Goetz |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
27 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Katja Goetz |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
27 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
9 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
9 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-12-25 |
You can find further information about peer review here.