Key factors influencing adoption of an innovation in primary health care: a qualitative study based on implementation theory
© Carlfjord et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 5 May 2010
Accepted: 23 August 2010
Published: 23 August 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 May 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 May 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yvonne Forsell|
|3 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Gagliardi|
|15 Jun 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jenny Ploeg|
|9 Jul 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Siw Carlfjord|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Jul 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Jul 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Gagliardi|
|27 Jul 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jenny Ploeg|
|8 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yvonne Forsell|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Siw Carlfjord|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|18 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|23 Aug 2010||Editorially accepted|
|23 Aug 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-11-60|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.