A survey of the management of urinary tract infection in children in primary care and comparison with the NICE guidelines
© Kennedy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 5 August 2009
Accepted: 26 January 2010
Published: 26 January 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 Aug 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Sep 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tej Mattoo|
|20 Dec 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ubirajara Barroso Jr.|
|8 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Kieran Kennedy|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jan 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Kieran Kennedy|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 Jan 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Jan 2010||Editorially accepted|
|26 Jan 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2296-11-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.