Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
25 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Sep 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Krit Pongpirul |
27 Oct 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marie-Josee Fleury |
28 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Stewart Mercer |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
28 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
17 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Krit Pongpirul |
31 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marie-Josee Fleury |
24 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Stewart Mercer |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
24 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
27 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Stewart Mercer |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
27 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
2 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Stewart Mercer |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
2 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
4 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
4 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-11-46 |
You can find further information about peer review here.