Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
10 Dec 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - hamish wilson |
20 Apr 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michel Wensing |
7 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Guro Huby |
9 Jun 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - John McKay |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
9 Jun 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Michel Wensing |
4 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Guro Huby |
14 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - John McKay |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
14 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
20 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - John McKay |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
25 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - John McKay |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
25 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
27 Aug 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - John McKay |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
27 Aug 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
1 Sep 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
1 Sep 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-10-61 |
You can find further information about peer review here.