Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Primary care physicians' reported use of pre-screening discussions for prostate cancer screening: a cross-sectional survey

  • Suzanne K Linder1, 2,
  • Sarah T Hawley3,
  • Crystale P Cooper4,
  • Lawrence E Scholl5,
  • Maria Jibaja-Weiss1 and
  • Robert J Volk1, 6Email author
BMC Family Practice200910:19

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-19

Received: 02 July 2008

Accepted: 18 March 2009

Published: 18 March 2009

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Jul 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Aug 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rhodri Evans
1 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lyndal Trevena
2 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deb Burford
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Robert Volk
Resubmission - Version 4
29 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Robert Volk
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
22 Jan 2009 Author responded Author comments - Robert Volk
Resubmission - Version 6
22 Jan 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
18 Mar 2009 Editorially accepted
18 Mar 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-10-19

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine
(2)
Center of Health Promotion and Prevention Research, The University of Texas School of Public Health
(3)
Division of General Medicine, Ann Arbor VAMC, University of Michigan
(4)
Soltera Center for Health Communication Research
(5)
Macro International Inc
(6)
Houston Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics, Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center

Advertisement