Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Quality improvement in small office settings: an examination of successful practices

  • Daniel Wolfson1,
  • Elizabeth Bernabeo2Email author,
  • Brian Leas3,
  • Shoshanna Sofaer4,
  • Gregory Pawlson5 and
  • Donna Pillittere5
Contributed equally
BMC Family Practice200910:14

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-14

Received: 16 July 2008

Accepted: 09 February 2009

Published: 09 February 2009

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Jul 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pieter van den Hombergh
8 Sep 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Attila Altiner
16 Oct 2008 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth Bernabeo
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Oct 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pieter van den Hombergh
14 Nov 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Attila Altiner
12 Jan 2009 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth Bernabeo
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Jan 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
2 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth Bernabeo
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
9 Feb 2009 Editorially accepted
9 Feb 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2296-10-14

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation
(2)
Quality Research, American Board of Internal Medicine
(3)
Department of Health Policy, Thomas Jefferson University
(4)
School of Public Affairs, Baruch College
(5)
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Advertisement